Watch RAG work, step by step
Animate the full Retrieval-Augmented Generation pipeline — from query to grounded response. See exactly what happens at each stage and explore chunking strategies.
RAG Pipeline
Click Run to animate, or click any stage to inspect it.
Click Run Pipeline to animate end-to-end, or click any stage to inspect it.
Chunking Strategies
How you split documents determines retrieval quality. Choose a strategy and see how the same text breaks into chunks.
Semantic caching in AI systems stores and retrieves previous LLM responses based on query similarity rather than exact matches. When a new query arrives, its embedding is compared to cached query embeddings. If the cosine similarity exceeds a threshold (typically 0.92–0.96), the cached response is returned directly, bypassing the expensive LLM call entirely.[1]This technique can reduce LLM API costs by 40–70% in enterprise applications where users frequently ask semantically similar questions. The trade-off is freshness — a cached response may become stale if the underlying knowledge base changes. Production implementations set a TTL (time-to-live) on cache entries, typically 24–72 hours for stable factual content.[2]The embedding model used for cache lookups is usually the same as the retrieval embedding model (e.g. text-embedding-3-small) to ensure semantic alignment. Some implementations use a cheaper, faster model for cache lookups and the full-quality model only for cache misses.
Go deeper on RAG architecture
Was this page helpful?
Sign in to cast your vote
Discussion
Sign in to share your feedback and join the discussion.

