Which guidance should you apply to design Power Platform workloads?
Why A is the answer
The Power Platform Well-Architected Framework
The Power Platform Well-Architected Framework gives pillars for designing reliable, secure and efficient workloads.
In detail
- The Power Platform Well-Architected Framework is the design guidance for these workloads.
- Use it for reviews as well as new designs.
Use case
An illustrative scenario, not a real incident.
A Power Platform app grows into a critical workload. The Well-Architected Framework helps review it for reliability and security.
See it in different ways
sequenceDiagram participant D as Dev participant T as Test participant P as Production D->>D: Unmanaged solution D->>T: Export as managed T->>P: Import after approval P->>P: Audit trail of the change
mindmap
root(("Power Platform Well-Architected"))
n1["Run"]
n2["Reliability"]
n3["Operational excellence"]
n4["Protect"]
n5["Security"]
n6["Serve"]
n7["Performance efficiency"]
n8["Experience optimization"]Key point: Well-Architected guides workload design.
Why the other options are wrong
- B. The Azure Monitor alerting guidance for each environment
- That covers Azure alerts.
- C. The Kubernetes production best practices
- That covers Kubernetes.
- D. The rules of a BPMN notation guide only
- BPMN is process notation only.